Month: May 2012

Getting Things Done: A Key Leadership Skill

    Jim D

It is a bit ironic that this post has taken me twice as long to do as my average post. But while it is an important topic, it is difficult to pinpoint, of all the practices you can leverage, which ones really help you or your team or organization get the right things done. So, just before the Memorial Day holiday, here is a post to help you execute better for the rest of the year and meet those goals.

Have a great holiday weekend.  Jim

Getting things done is a hallmark of effective teams. Unfortunately, the focus and flow of large business organizations combined with influences of the modern world erode our ability to get the right things done. To raise the productivity to a high performance team,  as a senior leader, you should impart an ability to get the right things done at the divisional and team level within your organization. And while there are myriad reasons that conspire to reduce our focus or effectiveness, there are a number of techniques and practices that can greatly improve the selection and capacity at all levels: at the overall organization or division, at the working team level, and for the individual.

Realize that the same positive forces that ensure a focus on business goals, drive consensus within an organization, or require risk and control to be addressed, can also be mis- or over-applied and result in organizational imbalance or gridlock. Coupled with too much waterfall or ‘big bang’ approaches and you can get not just ineffectiveness but spectacular failures of large efforts. At the organizational level, you should set the right agenda and framework so the productivity and capacity of your IT shop can be improved at the same time you are delivering to the business agenda. To set the right agenda look to the following practices:

  • provide a clear vision with robust goals that include clear delivery milestones and that are aligned to the business objectives. The vision should also be compelling — your team will only outperform for a worthwhile aspiration.
  • avoid too many big bets (an unbalanced portfolio) – your portfolio should be a mix of large, medium and small deliveries. This enables you to deliver a regular stream of benefits across a broader set of functions and constituents with less risk. Often a nice balancing investment area is drive several small efforts in HR and Finance that streamline and automate common processes in these areas used by much of the corporation (thus a good, broad positive impact on the corporate productivity).
  • aggregate your delivery – often IT efforts can be so tightly tied to immediate delivery for the business that the IT processes are substantially penalized including:
    • where a continuous stream of applications and updates are introduced into production without a release schedule (causing large amount of duplicative or indequate design, testing and implementation)
    • where a highly siloed delivery approach where every minor business unit has its own set of business systems resulting in redundant feature build and maintain work.
  • address poor quality standards and ineffective build capability including:
    • correct defects as early in the build process as possible. Defects correct at their source (design or implementation) are far less costly to fix than those corrected once in production
    • lower build productivity due to a lack of investment in the underlying ‘build factory’ including tools, training and processes or the teams do not leverage modern incremental or agile methods
    • delivery by the internal team of the full stack, where packaged software is not leveraged (recently I have encountered shops trying to do their own software distribution tools or data bases

So, in sum, at the organizational level, provide clarity of vision, review your portfolio for balance, make room for investments in your factory and look to simplify and consolidate.

At the team level, employ clarity, accountability, and simplicity to get the right things done. Whether it is a project or an ongoing function:

  • are the goals or deliverables clear?
  • are the efforts broken into incremental tasks or steps?
  • are the roles clear?
  • are the tasks assigned?
  • are there due dates? or good operational metrics?
  • is the solution or approach straightforward?
  • is there follow up to ensure that the important work takes priority and the work is done?

And then, most important, are you recognizing and rewarding those who gets things done with quality? There are many other factors that you may need to address or supplement to enable the team to be achieve results from providing specific direction to coaching to adding resources or removing poor performers. But frequently well-resourced teams can spin their wheels working on the wrong things, or delivering with poor quality or just not focusing on getting results. This is where clarity, accountability and simplicity make the difference and enable your team to get the right things done.

Most importantly, getting the right things done as an individual is a critical skill that enables outperformance. Look to hone your abilities with some of following suggestions:

  • recognize we tend to do what is urgent rather than what is important. Shed the unimportant but urgent tasks and spend more time on important tasks. In particular, use the time to be prepared, improve your skills, or do the planning work that is often neglected.
  • hold yourself accountable, make your commitments. As a leader you must demonstrate holding yourself to the same (or higher) standards as those for your team.
  • Make clear, fact-based decisions and don’t over-analyze. But seek inputs where possible from your team and experts. And leverage a low PDI style so you can avoid major mistakes.
  • and finally, a positive approach can make a world of a difference. Do your job with high purpose and in high spirit. Your team will see it and it will lighten their step as well.

So, those are the practices from my experience that have been enablers to getting things done. What would you add? or change? Do let me know.

Best, Jim Ditmore


 

Key Steps to Building a High Performance Team: Prune and Improve

    Jim D

Today I revisit a core topic of Recipes for IT: High Performance IT Teams. Before I provide background on this series of posts, I thought it was about time for a quick blog update. Recipes for IT continues to attract new readers and has a substantial ongoing readership. It is quite heartening to see the level of interest and I really appreciate your visits and comment. I will strive to regularly add thoughtful and relevant material for IT leaders and hope that you continue to find the site useful. I do recommend for new readers that you check out the introduction page and the various topic areas as you should find useful material of strong depth and actionability that can help you be more successful. This site also continues to do well in Google page rankings on a number of topic areas, particularly service desk queries and IT metrics and reporting. If there are topics you would like me to tackle, please do not hesitate to send me a comment.

Now back to some background on Building High Performance Teams. This post is now the fifth on this topic and there will be one further post to complete the steps of building a high performance team. I hope you find the material to be both enlightening and actionable. One key for IT leaders is that you consider the tasks required to build a HP team as some of your most important activities. At nearly every poor performing organization that I have been responsible for turning around, I have found that many times, the primary reason for inadequate talent and poor performing teams is inadequate manager attention and focus on these activities. So, work hard to make the time, even though you would much rather be doing other activities. And now for the post. Best, Jim

Building High Performance Teams: As I have mentioned previously, I have a positive outlook on the competence of today’s managers and leaders. I see more material and approaches available for managers than ever before and more effort and study applied by the managers as well. Much of the material though is either a very narrow spectrum or a single technique which does not address the full spectrum of practices and knowledge that must be brought to bear to build and sustain a high performance IT team. So,  I have assembled a set of practices that I have leveraged or I have seen peers or other senior IT leaders use to build high performance IT teams in this series of posts to enable managers to have a broad source of practice at their disposal.

Senior IT leaders, with his or her senior management team, can use these practices to build a high performing team, in the following steps:

Today’s post covers how to prune and improve as required. The previous steps are prior posts and I have further constructed reference pages with links above on the first four steps.  Subsequent posts will cover the last steps as well as a summary.

I think the aspiration of building a high performing team is a lofty, worthwhile, and achievable vision. If you have ever participated in a high performance team at the top of their game, in other words: a championship team, then you know the level of professional reward and sense of accomplishment that accompanies such membership. And for most companies that rely significantly on IT, if their IT team is a high performing team, it can make a very large difference in their products, their customer experience, and their bottom line. Building such a championship team is not only about attracting or retaining top talent, it is also necessarily about identifying those team members who do not have the capabilities, behaviors, or performance to remain part of the team and addressing their future role constructively but firmly.

Let’s first revisit some key truths that underly how to build a high performance team:

– top performing engineers, typically paid similar to their mediocre peers are not 10% better but 2x to 10x better

– having primarily senior engineers and not a good mix of interns, graduates, junior and mid and senior level engineers will result in stagnation and overpaid senior engineers doing low level work

– having a dozen small sites with little interaction is far less synergistic and productive than having a few strategic sites with critical mass

– relying on contractors to do most of the critical or transformational work is a huge penalty to retain or grow top engineers

– line and mid-level managers must be very good people managers, not great engineers, otherwise you are likely have difficulty retaining good talent and you will not develop your talent

– engineers do not want to work in an expensive in-city location like the financial district of London (that is for investment bankers)

– enabling an environment where mistakes can be made, lessons learned, and quality and innovation and initiative are prized means you will get a staff that behaves and performs like that.

With these truths in mind, (and these are the same ones you used to set about building the team), having executed the first four steps, you should have adequate capacity to begin thoughtful pruning and improvement of your organization. While there are circumstances when a poor performing manager or senior engineer causes so many issues that it is a benefit to remove them, in many cases you must have adequate resource capacity to meet demands so that once you begin pruning your team is not overtaxed and penalized as a result.

Pruning should begin at the top and work down from there. Start with your directs and the next level below. Consider the span of control of your organization and the number of levels. High performing organizations are generally flatter with greater spans of control. In considering your team, I recommend leveraging a talent calibration approach of either the typical 9 box or a top-grading variant. The key to calibration is to essentially formulate three sets of results: those on your staff that are top performers that you will need to further develop and challenge; the ‘well-placed experts’ and solid performers that will need support and attention but will execute reliably; and those whose performance and potential is lacking and who must step up to continue in their role. With these three groupings of your management team identified, ensure you lay out crisp plans for all three groups and execute against them. (Remember, it will be very difficult for you to subsequently demand of your line managers that they address their staff issues if you have not shown a capability to execute such accountability with your team.)

One area to particularly focus on is time-boxing the development plans for poor performers. As these are senior managers the time to address performance issues should be shorter not longer. I recommend you start the development plan with a succinct, clear conversation on high expectations and shortcoming of their performance with examples where possible. You should provide a writeup covering this discussion at the end of the discussion. Jointly layout key deliverables, milestones, expected behavior changes and results with the affected leader. Be open to the possibility that the employee may know they are in over their head and may be looking for an alternative. While not advocating moving problem performers around, there may be a role within the company or elsewhere outside the company that is a much better fit. Look to assist with such a transition if beneficial for the company and the employee. If the employee insists this is the role they want and they are willing to step up and adjust, then you should provide support under a tight timeline for them to achieve it. Monitor the plan regularly with HR. If you follow up diligently it will become evident quite quickly that the employee can muster to the new level or not. Generally, in my experience, a surprisingly large percentage of poor performing employees will drop out of their own accord once you have provided clear expectations and no escape routes other than the hard work to get there — assuming of course that there is a modest but respectable exit plan for them. It is also key to treat the employee with respect and fairness throughout the process and focus on the results and outcomes.

Equally though, I have more than a handful of senior leaders and managers who have expressed surprise when confronted with poor performance as no one had communicated clearly and firmly their performance issues previously. Once understood and once the higher goals and expectations were known, many of these individuals (and others as well), definitively stepped up and improved significantly. Thus, until you communicate the higher goals and expectations clearly AND communicate where they must improve (constructively, with specifics) the likelihood of improvement is minimal. So, allocate the time to hold the tough but fair conversations and provide this information. Once the conversations are held, over the next 2 to 3 months you should take action based on the results. Either poor performing managers will be exited (or moved to a role much more befitting) or poor performers will become good performers.  One of the interesting results from such actions is that the remaining team, upon seeing poor performers exited, will view the results positively. In fact, I have experienced some very strong reactions from other team members who now felt a dead weight was off of their shoulders as they no longer had to make up for the defects and negative performance of the just exited team member. Further, I have received multiple (back-handed) compliments along the lines of ‘Wow, we are glad management finally figured out what to do and took action!’ . So do not be persuaded that the team will view performance actions solely in a negative light.

Once you have initiated the performance management process and you are well in the process of pruning your team, you can work with your managers and HR department to address areas lower in the organization. Remember it is key to first set expectations and goals that cascade and match your overall goals. Then ensure you hold managers and senior engineers to a higher bar than the mid and junior staff. For senior staff, you are not looking just for technical competence but also they must meet the standard for such behaviors as problem solving/solution orientation, teamwork, initiative and drive, and quality and focus on doing things right. And they should exhibit the right leadership and communication skills.

Driving such pruning and development work through your organization is important but also a delicate task. Generally, with little exception, management in a IT organization can improve how they handle performance management. Because most of the managers are engineers, their ability to interact firmly with another person in a highly constructive manner is typically under-developed. Thus, some managers may not be up to this pruning task or their calibration of talent could be well off the mark. So, leverage your HR resources to guide management and personally check in to ensure proper calibration of talent by your lower level managers. Provide classes and interactive session on how to do coaching and provide feedback to employees. Even better, insist that performance reviews and development plans must be read and signed off by the manager’s manager before being given to improve their quality. This a key element to focus on because a poorly executed resource improvement plan could backfire. Remember that the line manager’s interaction with an employee is the largest factor in undesired attrition and employee engagement. Of course, these is all the more reason to replace poor performing managers with good leaders, but do so effectively and firmly. Use the workforce plans that you developed in the Build step to ensure your pruning and development also helps you move toward your strategic site goals, contractor/staff mix targets, and junior/mid/senior profiles.

Pruning and improvement is the tough but necessary step in building a high performance team. If done well, pruning and improvement will provide additional substantial lift to the team and more importantly, enable ongoing sustainment. It requires discipline and focus to execute the steps we would all prefer to avoid, but are necessary for reaching the final high performance stages.

What has been your experience either as a leader or participant in such efforts? What have you seen go very well? or terribly wrong? I look forward to your perspective.

Best, Jim Ditmore

IT Service Desk: Turning around a ‘helpless’ desk

    Steve Wignall
In one of our earliest posts on service desks, I mentioned how an inherited service desk had delivered such poor service that it was referred to by users as the ‘Helpless Desk’ rather than the Help Desk. With that in mind, for those IT leaders who have a poor service situation on your hands with your most important customer interface, this post outlines how to stabilize and then turnaround your service desk. For those new to this site, there is a service desk reference page and also posts to understand service desk elements and best practices.
Service Desks can underperform for a number of reasons, but ongoing poor performance is generally due to a confluence of causes. Typically, underlying issues thrust service desks into poor performance when combined with major changes to the supply (or agent service) or the demand (the calls and requests coming into the desk).  It is important to recognize that service desks are in essence call centres. Call Centre performance is driven by the supply and demand, with an effective service at an efficient cost representing equilibrium – the point at which the competing forces of supply and demand are in optimized with each other. A supply side or demand side ‘shock’ can move the state of equilibrium to a point outside of management control and if there are other fundamental issues, it will result in sustained underperformance by the Service Desk.

There is a ‘tipping point’ within Call Centre mechanics which means that the rate of deterioration will become exponential  – i.e., the gentle gradient of deterioration does not last long before service falls over the cliff edge (i.e. wait times in seconds, quickly become minutes and then tens of minutes – even hours). Calls are abandoned by customers, with call backs adding further volume. Agents become overworked and stressed due to the tone of the calls, their efficiency reduces and attrition goes up, exacerbating any supply shortage. These dynamics also work in reverse and so what can seem to be an insurmountable problem can in fact be rapidly returned to stability if managed appropriately.

Common supply side issues include:

  • Organisations increasingly use headcount caps and quotas to control their cost base. As the quota filters through the organisation, there can be a tendency to retain ‘higher end’ roles, which means the Service Desk comes under particular scrutiny and challenge. A reduction in the supply of labour (without equivalent changes in demand) can very quickly lead to significant service deterioration.
  • Similarly, Service Desk tends to be a function in which organisations have an uplifted appetite to make organisational changes to outsource and offshore (and similarly insource and onshore as the cycle runs). The wholesale replacement of the Service Desk workforce is a fairly common scenario within the industry and is frequently the root cause of acute service issues in the run up to change (as attrition without replacement bites) and during and post change (as a new workforce struggles to support their new customer base).
  • Any issue / initiative that either reduces the availability of agents to handle live calls or leads to a significant increase in the transaction time to do so can very quickly have a catastrophic impact on service. For example; the implementation of a new Service Management toolset is likely to elongate call duration in the short to medium term, a call centre with a high attrition rate will constantly lose agents just as they start to perform – to be replaced by a trainee performing at a sub optimal level and a call centre operating at too high an occupancy level will quickly burn out staff and have an increasing level of absenteeism.

Demand side issues commonly include;

  • Growth of the user base, generating an uplifted volume of contacts to the Service Desk.
  • An increase in contacts per supported user, driven by increasing IT usage or deterioration of IT performance (this is frequently driven by Business or IT change activity delivered by Projects and Programmes – such as the deployment of a new application to the workforce).

Irrespective of the root cause of the failure, service remediation needs to be a concerted effort combining strong analysis with disciplined planning and focused execution. Identifying that there is an issue and responding appropriately in a timely manner should happen automatically if you are already operating with maturity from fact based metrics that have a healthy mix of lead and lag indicators. If the organisation is less mature in its use of metrics (and particularly lead indicators) then the ‘crisis’ is not likely to be noticed (or at least taken seriously by senior leadership) until after the Service Desk hits the tipping point and service is deteriorating at an alarming pace, generating severe customer dissatisfaction (i.e. until it is too late).

Remediating a failing Service Desk requires multiple and varied actions dependent upon the root cause of the issues. The approach to identifying and rectifying those root causes can be managed effectively by following a logical framework.

Step 1 – Stabilize

If service has tumbled over the tipping point and is deteriorating rapidly, there is going to be little sponsorship for an extended analysis and planning exercise. Results – or at least avoiding further deterioration of performance – will be expected immediately. Your first priority is to create the space to put together a meaningful recovery plan.

Do everything that you can do to boost the supply side in the short term (overtime / shift amendments / cessation of any non-time critical, non-customer contact work by your agents, boost the number of agents by diverting resources to customer service roles from other positions etc, bring in temporary resources, etc). This will not fix the issue and is not a sustainable containment strategy; it will however create the window of opportunity you require and give a much needed boost to stakeholder confidence that the ‘freefall’ may be over. By itself, it will reduce the cycle of abandons and call backs that create additional work for the team.

Similar attention should be paid to any demand side actions that can be deployed quickly, it is less likely however that you can act immediately on the demand side, but there are steps that can be taken quickly. If there are recent system or application rollouts that are generating questions and calls, it may be worthwhile to send out a FAQ or Quick Tips to help employees understand what to do without calling the service desk. Or any self help initiatives already in the pipeline could be accelerated to remove some calls. While these actions are more likely to form elements of your strategic recovery plan, the may provide some level of relief.

Step 2 – Undertake the Analysis

Your leadership group and analysts need to undertake the analysis to understand why service has deteriorated. What has gone wrong, when, where and why? If your desk has been performing well (or even adequately) for some time, remember that a recent ‘change’ in either the demand or supply side is likely to be the root cause.

If the desk has been underperforming for a significant period, there are likely to be more systemic causes of the failure and so a full strategic review of your operations is required. Reading the full set of Service Desk Best Practices published within Recipes for IT will provide guidance on the areas of focus required.

After understanding your call volumes and their trends (everything from call time to why customers are calling) you should be able to identify some of the root causes. Are there new issues that are now in the top 10 call reasons? Are your call times elongated? Have call volumes or peaks increased? For each shift in metrics, analyze for the following:

  • determine if the root cause for a customer call is due to:
      • system issues or changes
      • user training or understanding
      • lack of viable self-service channel
  • identify if increases in calls are due to:
      • underlying user volume increases or growth
      • new user technologies or systems
      • major rollouts or releases that are problematic
  • or if service is suffering due to:
      • lack of resources or mismatched resource levels and call volumes
      • inadequate training of service desk personnel
      • new or ineffective toolsets that elongate service time
      • inefficient procedures or poor engagement
      • high attrition or loss of personnel

If you do not have adequate metrics to support the analysis, then you will need to establish basic metrics collection as the first, fundamental step.

Step 3 – Construct the Recovery Plan

Constructing the recovery plan needs to be genuinely solution-oriented and outcome focused. The objective of the plan is not usually to resolve the source of the ‘shock’ to return us back to the old equilibrium (e.g. we aren’t likely to want to back out the new Service Management toolset that we have just implemented – we will want to build forward). The objective of the plan is to detail the actions required to resolve the issues identified as well as build a solid foundation to allow us to move back to a steady state operation, delivering with quality and consistency to our SLA.

A good recovery plan will be clear about what actions are to be undertaken, by who, when, to achieve which specific deliverable and with specific measures and metrics tracking progress to achievement of the overall outcome.

The plan needs to focus on prioritising actions that can make a positive impact of scale and of pace commensurate to the scale of the service issues being experienced. Many and multiple actions on a service recovery plan creates a false sense of comfort for those involved in the crisis and will almost certainly hinder genuine service improvement. Targeted action is required and this needs discipline and skill from the plan owner to ensure that benefits will be realised, will be relevant to the problem statement and that our actions in aggregate will move bottom line performance to where we need it to be.

We recommend a recovery plan that has the following elements:

a. Maintain an interim staffing boost to stabilize the service desk until other work is completed

b. If clear problem causes are identified (poorly rolled out systems, ongoing defective systems causing high volumes of calls) then ensure these areas are high priority for fixes on the next release or maintenance cycle.

c. Match resources to demand cycles based on current volumes and call handle times. Then forecast proper resource levels based on improvement initiatives and their completion dates.

d. If self service can address a significant volume of calls, these should also be a top priority for investment as this solution is also usually an overall cost save as well as service experience improvement (e.g. password resets).

e. Ensure your service desk staff can efficiently handle calls — proper training, tool adjustments, thoughtful goals, incentives and a productive environment.

f. Address staff recruiting as well as development, incentives, and training and career progression to ensure you will have an engaged and well-trained staff to deliver exceptional service

g. Review your IVR and call centre technology setup and look to optimize menus, self-service, and call back options. Specialize resources into pools as appropriate to improve efficiency.

h. Define strategic service goals and SLAs along with initiatives to achieve them (e.g., additional or different sites, knowledge management tools, revamp of problem systems, etc).

Step 4 – Execute the Recovery Plan

Ensure that the plan is owned by an individual with the gravitas, influence, experience and focus to manage it through with real pace and drive. Ideally, the individual should not own actions within the plan itself (as this undermines their ability to hold everyone fully to account and removes their impartiality when inevitable conflicting priorities arise).

The plan can (and should) be meaningfully tuned as you progress with delivery. It should not however be a constant exercise in planning and re-planning and particular focus needs to be applied to ensure that commitments (delivery to time, cost and quality) are met by all action owners.

Communicate the issue, the plan, progress & improvement achieved to date and upcoming actions from your recovery plan to stakeholders. Ensure that stakeholder management is a specific activity within your plan and that you pay particular attention to each stakeholder group as a constituency. The role of senior leaders in recovery situations should be to protect the operations team to enable it to focus on delivery through the management of senior clients and customers and to ensure that the required resources to remediate the issues are provided.

Step 5 – Take a Look Back

Once service has been remediated and stabilised there are a number of residual actions to undertake.

  • As additional resources were utilised in the recovery effort (holidays restricted, time off in lieu accumulated, overtime paid etc…) there may well be negative service and / or financial implications of those decisions. It is important to quickly understand any such impacts and to manage them appropriately (e.g., review the holiday allocation process to ensure accumulated holidays can still be scheduled without a bottleneck, determine whether to grant time off in lieu for extra hours worked or to pay overtime, ensure that departments and functions who have been loaning staff to the front line receive support and resources to now clear their backlogs quickly etc.).
  • Review the control processes and responsiveness of your Service Desk in the identification of the issue / issues and how this could be improved upon in the future (in particular the use of lead and lag performance metrics). The ‘root causes’ identified should be eliminated or carefully tracked to ensure that future occurrences can be identified and dealt with before they manifest as service impact to your customers.
  • Ensure that the findings of your root cause analysis are communicated to and understood by your stakeholders. Be honest, be clear and be candid about what has happened, why and the measures that are now in place to prevent / mitigate any future such occurrences.
  • Say Thank You as the milestones are completed. A number of people will have participated in the recovery effort, some very explicitly and others in a very low key manner (for example by absorbing extra workload from colleagues seconded to the front line). Recognising their contribution and taking the time to say Thank You will ensure that your team feel rewarded for their efforts and motivated to stand shoulder to shoulder in tackling future adverse events that impact customer service.

And with these efforts, you will have turned the ‘helpless desk’ into a positive key interface for your customers.

Best, Steve Wignall and Jim Ditmore